The Difference In The Quality Of Tear Film In College Student Soft Contact Lens User And Non Contact Lens User At Lampung University

Authors

  • Aulia Fasya Medical Faculty, Lampung University
  • M. Yusran
  • Giska Tri Putri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53089/medula.v12i3.512

Keywords:

Contact lenses, Dry eye, OSDI questionnaire, Schirmer test I

Abstract

Background: Dry eye is a disorder of the tear film which could cause damage and discomfort to the ocular surface. Some contributing factors for dry eye are age, gender, tobacco consumption, continously being in an air-conditioned room, and the use of contact lens.

Research Objectives: To determine the differences in tear film quality between the University of Lampung students soft contact lens user and non soft contact lens user.

Research Methods: This research was an analytical observational study with cross sectional approach. The sample in this study were 120 students of the University of Lampung consisting of 60 student who use soft contact lens and 60 student non soft contact lens user. This study used the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire and the Schirmer I test.

Results: The most common complaints associated with the use of soft contact lens were complaints in the form of pain or dry eyes in a total of 52 (86,7%), while there were 43 (71,7%) complaints from the students who don’t wear soft contact lens where their eyes were light-sensitive. The prevalence of dry eyes based on OSDI questionnaires in the soft contact lens user group versus non soft contact lens user: dry eye with mild degree 10 students (16.7%) versus 20 students (33.3%), dry eye with moderate degree 13 students (21.7%) versus 6 students (10%), dry eye with severe degree 27 students (45%) versus 7 students (11.7%) (p = 0,000). According to the Schirmer I test, the prevalence of the dry eye in the group who use soft contact lens are 11 students (18,3%) and in the group non soft contact lens user are 2 students (3,3%) (p=0,019).

Conclusion: There were significant differences in the eye tear quality based on the OSDI questionnaire and Schirmer I test results between the University of Lampung students who use soft contact lens and non soft contact lens user.

References

Sitompul R. Perawatan Lensa Kontak untuk Mencegah Komplikasi. eJournal Kedokteran Indonesia. 2015; 3(1):80-85.

General Optical Council. BMG Research GOC 2015 Contact Lens Survey, General Optical Council, United Kingdom; 2016.

Muntz A, Subbaraman LN, Sorbara L, Jones L. Tear Exchange and Contact Lens: A Review. J. Optom. 2015; 8(1):2-11.

Alipour F, Khaheshi S, Soleimanzadeh M, Heidarzadeh S, Heydarzadeh S. Contact-lens related complications: A review. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2017; 12(2):193-204.

Dumbleton K, Woods CA, Jones LW, Fonn D. The impact of contemporary contact lenses on contact lens discontinuation. Eye contact lens. 2013; 39(1):93–9.

Wakarie PR, Rares L. Perbandingan Produksi Air Mata Pada Pengguna Lensa Kontak Dengan Yang Tidak Menggunakan Lensa Kontak. Jurnal e-Clinic. 2014; 2(1):1-6.

Craig JP, Nichols KK, Akpek EK, Caffery B, Dua HS, Joo C, Dkk. TFOS DEWS II Definition and Classification Report. The Ocular Surface. 2017; 15(3):276-83.

Pietersz EL, Sumual V, Rares L. Penggunaan Lensa Kontak dan Pengaruhnya terhadap dry eye pada Mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Sam Ratulangi. Jurnal e-Clinic. 2016.

Riley C, Young G, Chalmers R. Prevalence of Ocular Surface Symptoms, Signs and Uncomfortable Hours of Wear in Contact Lens Wearers the Effect of Refitting with Daily-Wear Silicone Hydrogel Lenses (Senofilcon A). Eye Contact Lens. 2006; 32(6):281–6.

Ilyas S, Yulianti SR. Ilmu Penyakit Mata Edisi Ke-5. Jakarta: Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia; 2015.

Papas E, Tilia D, McNally J, de la Jara PL. Ocular Discomfort Responses after Short Periods of Contact Lens Wear. 2015; 92 (6):665-70.

Asiedu K, Kyei S, Boampong F, Ocansey S. Symptomatic dry eye and its associated factors: a study of university undergraduate students in Ghana. Eye Contact Lens. 2017; 43(4):262-6.

Bakkar MM, Shihadeh WA, Haddad MF, Khader YS. Epidemiology of symptoms of dry eye disease (DED) in Jordan: A cross-sectional nonclinical population-based study. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2016; 39(3):197-202.

Syaqdiyah WH, Prihatningtias R, Saubig AN. Hubungan Lama Pemakaian Lensa Kontak dengan Mata Kering. Jurnal Kedokteran Diponegoro. 2018; 7(2):462-71.

Guillon M, Maissa C. Dry Eye Symptomatology of Soft Contact Lens Wearers and Nonwearers. Optometry and Vision Science. 2005; 82(9):829-34.

Unlu C, Guney E, Akcay BIS, Akcali G, Erdogan G, Bayramlar H. Comparison of ocular-surface disease index questionnaire, tearfilm break-up time, and Schirmer test for the evaluation of the tearfilm in computer users with and without dry-eye symptomatology. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2012; 6:1303-6.

Ozcura F, Aydin S, Helvaci MR. Ocular Surface Disease Index for the Diagnosis of Dry Eye Syndrome. Ocular Immunology and Inflammation. 2007; 15:389-93.

Singh Brinder G, Singh Brinder H. Reflex epiphora in patients with dry eye symptoms: role of variable time Schirmer-1 test. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2005; 15: 429-33.

Published

2023-01-19

How to Cite

Fasya, A., M. Yusran, & Giska Tri Putri. (2023). The Difference In The Quality Of Tear Film In College Student Soft Contact Lens User And Non Contact Lens User At Lampung University. Medical Profession Journal of Lampung, 12(3), 575-581. https://doi.org/10.53089/medula.v12i3.512

Issue

Section

Artikel